No saved results · Entries · 2026-09-04
Four 'improvements' on a 113-stock 1h basket
What this means
This script tried four tweaks on 113 stocks (breakeven at TP1, top-tier patterns only, an above-100-MA filter and RSI divergence). Nothing was saved, and it used the hindsight Python zigzag. Breakeven at TP1 is in the live rule, but not because of evidence from this script. Nothing can be concluded; each tweak would need a TradingView sweep with saved logs.
The explanation is our best reading; the data shows the result but not the cause directly.
By timeframe
| Timeframe | Verdict | n | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15-minute | Not tested: no saved output; each of its four ideas is tested on all four timeframes elsewhere (exit-breakeven-all-tf, pattern studies, filter-rsi-ma-recheck) | ||
| 1-hour | Not tested: no saved output; each of its four ideas is tested on all four timeframes elsewhere (exit-breakeven-all-tf, pattern studies, filter-rsi-ma-recheck) | ||
| 4-hour | Not tested: no saved output; each of its four ideas is tested on all four timeframes elsewhere (exit-breakeven-all-tf, pattern studies, filter-rsi-ma-recheck) | ||
| Daily | Not tested: no saved output; each of its four ideas is tested on all four timeframes elsewhere (exit-breakeven-all-tf, pattern studies, filter-rsi-ma-recheck) | ||
- Hypothesis
- Breakeven at TP1, S/A-tier patterns only, and trend/momentum confluence (above 100 MA or RSI divergence) each improve the 1h baseline.
- Method
- Own Python sim, yfinance 1h, 113 tickers.
- Result
- No saved output.
- How much to trust it
- Low: Python zigzag with hindsight; nothing saved
- Did it change the live rule?
- BE at TP1 is in the live rule, but this script left no evidence
Scripts and data for this study will be linked here when the research code is published on GitHub.
Education and research only. Not financial advice. Backtests use today's index members (survivorship bias).