Open Harmonics · Experiments

No saved results · Entries · 2026-09-22

Would a limit order at Point D (or a 50% pullback) beat the confirmation entry?

What this means

This tested resting a buy limit at Point D or at a 50% pullback instead of buying at confirmation. Nothing from the original run was saved, and it used a hindsight zigzag. A later, separate study (transcript only) found a limit at D did no better than random entries on 1h (−0.02R) and worse on 4h (−0.25R), but that cannot be checked. Nothing firm can be concluded; a proper test would place the limit orders inside TradingView's own bar-by-bar engine and save the logs.

The explanation is our best reading; the data shows the result but not the cause directly.

By timeframe

TimeframeVerdictnResult
15-minuteNot tested: not tested yet: no 15-minute price data; needs 15m prices or a TradingView run; skipped anyway: original not reproducible (see tradingview_runs.md)
1-hourNot tested: not tested: fillable with 1h prices (2023-11+), but skipped: original has no saved output (console only, look-ahead zigzag); not reproducible; HAV limit-at-D figures exist only in a transcript
4-hourNot tested: not tested: fillable with prices, but skipped: original has no saved output (console only, look-ahead zigzag); not reproducible
DailyNot tested: not tested: fillable with daily prices, but skipped: original has no saved output (console only, look-ahead zigzag); not reproducible
Hypothesis
A buy limit at D, at D+15% or at a 50% pullback improves R-multiple, win rate and expectancy.
Method
Own Python sim, yfinance 1h; variants: limit at D, keep original stop distance, target = confirmation price, RSI/S3 filters.
Result
No saved output (console only). In the later HAV study (transcript only) a limit order at the HAV D level was -0.02R vs random on 1h and -0.25R on 4h.
How much to trust it
Low: hindsight zigzag; nothing saved
Did it change the live rule?
No.

Scripts and data for this study will be linked here when the research code is published on GitHub.

← All experiments

Education and research only. Not financial advice. Backtests use today's index members (survivorship bias).