No saved results · Instruments & watchlist · 2026-09-05 (initial commit)
Broad 50-stock S&P sample across all 11 sectors
What this means
This checked 50 large caps across all 11 sectors to see whether the edge was spread widely, but nothing was saved. Nothing can be concluded from it. The later TradingView sweeps of about 500 stocks address the same question more fully (see tf-universe-sweeps).
The explanation is our best reading; the data shows the result but not the cause directly.
By timeframe
| Timeframe | Verdict | n | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15-minute | Not tested: original Python run has no saved output; the question is answered from the logs by the new study ins-concentration | ||
| 1-hour | Not tested: original Python run has no saved output; the question is answered from the logs by the new study ins-concentration | ||
| 4-hour | Not tested: original Python run has no saved output; the question is answered from the logs by the new study ins-concentration | ||
| Daily | Not tested: original Python run has no saved output; the question is answered from the logs by the new study ins-concentration | ||
- Hypothesis
- The edge is not a selection artefact of a few stocks.
- Method
- Own Python engine on yfinance, 50 large caps.
- Result
- No saved output.
- How much to trust it
- Low: nothing saved
- Did it change the live rule?
- No.
Scripts and data for this study will be linked here when the research code is published on GitHub.
Education and research only. Not financial advice. Backtests use today's index members (survivorship bias).